Are Photos Considered Digital Art?

Art|Digital Art

This has been a question that has been debated for years. While there are some people that consider photography to be a form of art, there are others who believe that it is not.

When it comes to photography, there is no denying that it is an important part of modern culture. Photos have the ability to capture moments in time and can evoke powerful emotions from the viewer.

They have become an integral part of our lives and are often used to document important events and milestones. However, this does not necessarily mean that photography is considered digital art.

Many people argue that in order for something to be considered art, it needs to have creativity and originality involved in its creation. Photography does not necessarily involve either of these things as it is often based on capturing a moment as it already exists rather than creating something completely new. However, others argue that creativity can still be found in the way the photographer chooses to frame and compose the shot as well as in the use of light and color within the image.

Another argument against photography being considered digital art is that anyone with access to a camera can take photos and therefore they lack authenticity or uniqueness compared to other forms of art such as painting or sculpting which require skill, talent, and practice. However, many believe that photography still has value even if it lacks originality because it allows us to capture moments which would otherwise be lost forever.


Ultimately, whether or not photos are considered digital art will depend on personal opinion as there is no clear-cut answer either way. However, what can be said for certain is that photography has become an essential part of our lives and will continue to be used as a powerful medium for communication for years to come regardless of how it is classified.