Is Art History a Useless Major?

Art|Art History

The question of whether studying Art History is a useless major has been an enigmatic and contested issue for many years. With its focus on the analysis, interpretation, and appreciation of artwork, art history has been both praised and dismissed by various sources. On one hand, it is seen as a major that helps to foster critical thinking skills, while on the other hand it is viewed as having no practical application in the real world.

Advocates of Art History often cite its ability to help students gain a greater understanding of history and culture. By studying works from different periods in time, art historians gain insight into how different societies functioned and how they interacted with each other. Additionally, art history can be used to gain an understanding of how certain events shaped the course of human history and to appreciate the aesthetic value of artwork from around the globe.

Critics of Art History, however, argue that studying art does not provide students with any tangible skills or knowledge that can be applied in the modern world. They claim that there are no jobs available for graduates who have studied art history and thus it is not a worthwhile major. They also point out that art appreciation can be developed without having to go through all four years of college-level coursework in order to gain a degree in this field.

Conclusion: Ultimately, whether or not studying Art History is a useless major depends on individual circumstances and goals. For those looking for an academic path that will provide them with specialized knowledge about works from different periods in time, then pursuing a degree in this field may be beneficial. However, for those who are seeking more practical skills or knowledge that can be applied directly to their future career paths then studying art history may not be the best option.