The debate on whether digital art is considered photography or not has been ongoing for some time. It is important to note that digital art and photography are two distinct artistic mediums, but there are some similarities between them.
Digital art is created using computer software and tools. These tools can be used to create a wide variety of images, from abstract to photorealistic. Digital art can also be used to edit existing photographs or to create entirely new compositions from scratch.
Photography, on the other hand, relies on capturing light and creating an image with a camera. It does not involve any manipulation of the image, and the photographer relies only on his or her skill and knowledge of the craft.
It is clear that digital art and photography are two different mediums, but they do have some similarities. Both involve the use of technology to create an image, and both rely on artistic expression as well as technical skill. This makes it difficult to definitively say whether digital art should be considered photography or not.
The answer may depend on how you define photography and how you define digital art. If you consider photography to include any image that is created using technology then digital art could indeed be considered a type of photography. However, if you define photography as only using a camera then digital art would not be included as it does not require a camera for its creation.
Ultimately, it is up to individuals to decide for themselves what they consider photography and what they consider digital art. There are no right or wrong answers here; it all comes down to personal preference and definition of each medium.
In conclusion, it is difficult to definitively answer the question “Is Digital Art Considered Photography?” Whether or not you consider digital art part of the traditional definition of photography depends largely upon your own interpretation of both mediums.