What Makes New Realism Different From Pop Art?

Art|Pop Art

New Realism is a style of art that emerged in the late 1950s and early 1960s, primarily in Europe. It was a reaction to the abstract styles of painting that had become popular in the U.S. and Europe during this time period.

The artists involved sought to present a more realistic view of their surroundings, focusing on everyday objects and life events. The movement was led by French artist Pierre Restany, who wrote extensively about the philosophy behind New Realism.

Pop Art, on the other hand, began to emerge a few years later in the mid-1960s, primarily in Britain and America. Pop Art was an attempt to bring popular culture into the realm of fine art.

It sought to use mass-produced images (such as those found on commercial products or advertisements) as a way of commenting on contemporary society. The movement was led by British artists such as Richard Hamilton and Peter Blake.

What Makes New Realism Different From Pop Art?

The main difference between New Realism and Pop Art is their respective focuses. New Realism is focused on representing reality through everyday objects and events while Pop Art uses mass-produced images from popular culture as its focus. Additionally, while both movements began around the same time period (the late 1950s/early 1960s), they emerged from different places – with New Realism beginning in Europe and Pop Art starting mainly in Britain and America.

Conclusion

New Realism differs from Pop Art in its focus on representing reality through everyday objects and events, while Pop Art focuses on mass-produced images from popular culture. Additionally, they began around the same time period but originated from different places – with New Realism beginning in Europe and Pop Art mainly originating from Britain and America.